Assessment is a crucial part of
education. It not only shows the teacher whether or not, or to what extent, a
student has understood a given lesson, but also directs what will be taught
next. This is called diagnostic assessment. While some assessment can be
formal, a great deal of assessment should happen in informal or “authentic”
learning settings. One example of this informal assessment is conferencing. For
the educational layperson, conferencing is a one-on-one meeting the teacher has
with every student once a week. Each
conference lasts about 10 minutes and the student tells the teacher what they
have been reading, what strategies they’ve been using, what they are struggling
with, etc. These conferences should be recorded by the teacher in an organized
fashion, so they can assess progress over time. The format of this organization
can take many forms. For example:
The format I typically use is a simple chart that records the
date, the book currently being read and whether it is fiction or non-fiction, a
few notes on what the student is doing well, and a few notes on what we worked on
together or what I think they should work on next. Sounds simple, no?
The answer to that question is an
emphatic “no!” There is so much to keep in mind during a conference! In Catching Readers before They Fall,
Johnson and Keier recommend the teacher asking him- or herself these questions:
·
Is the child comprehending and to what extent?
·
What strategic actions are being used?
·
How are the strategic actions helping the reader
understand what he or she is reading?
·
How does the reading sound? Is it smooth or
choppy? Is it well paced and phrased? Does the child attend to punctuation?
·
What does the child do when stuck on a word?
What sources of information is the child using or neglecting?
·
Is the child enjoying the book?
·
What is his or her attitude toward reading?
This is a large number of broad, open-ended (for the most
part) questions to bear in mind, and this is the short list! After gathering
data, Johnson and Keier recommend a longer series of more specific questions For
example, Can the child predict at the word level? At the text level? Can the
child infer information from the text? Is the child flexible in
problem-solving? Is the child self-monitoring for voice/print patch? For meaning?
Of course, these are just examples of the kinds of questions a teacher should
be seeking answers to, but it illustrates the vast array of skills neccesary to
meaningful reading. Once the answers to these questions are determined and the
teacher knows exactly what a student can and cannot do, they must then decide
what the most important next step is for each student.
Conferencing – meeting weekly with
each student to discuss their reading - is a simple idea in theory and, I
believe, a very good one. I am fortunate enough to have had opportunities to
conference with many students at different reading levels and in different grades.
While I have always loved books and this makes it easy for me to talk with
children about books, I lack experience in language arts instruction and am not
yet comfortable with simultaneous assessment and instruction. I am not yet sure
what conversational direction is best, what strategy would most help a student
progress, or which is a small detail to work on and which evidence of a wide or
essential gap in their reading process system. Since the vast majority of my knowledge about
teaching language arts is new, it has not been sorted into a hierarchy of
importance. If a kid is struggling with reading fluently, and predicting, and
Text-to-Life/World/Text connections, etc., I am not comfortable assessing which
to approach first. I suppose that, as I gain experience, conferencing will feel
less like I am treading water and more like I am actually swimming. I look
forward to that time because it will make learning to read easier for my
students as well as making teaching to read easier for me. Ongoing assessment,
such as weekly conferencing is an essential skill for teachers to learn and utilize.
Good assessment demonstrates to the teacher exactly what each student can and
cannot do, determines what lessons will be taught next, shows ongoing student
progress, and can also be a very useful tool for talking to anxious parents.

No comments:
Post a Comment